Ambient documentation tools are already in psychiatric consulting rooms, and a Lancet Psychiatry personal view makes an argument that is easy to miss while using one: the tool bundles three operations that are not alike. Generating the history of present illness is narrative construction from what was said. Generating the mental state examination is observation - and the mental state is largely unnarrated, so the model is producing an account of something that was never spoken aloud. Generating the assessment and plan is diagnostic reasoning, a formulation rather than a record.
The authors argue psychiatry exposes these differences more sharply than other specialties, because word choice carries therapeutic and legal weight, because the mental state examination has no spoken source text, and because formulation is the work itself rather than a summary of it. Each operation therefore has its own failure mode, its own oversight requirement, and its own implications for consent and liability.
This is a personal view, not evidence, and it should be read as a framework rather than a finding. But the practical distinction is usable today: a scribe's history can be checked against memory of the consultation, a scribe's mental state cannot be checked against anything, and a scribe's formulation is a clinical judgement being made by something that is not clinically accountable. In Indian practice the regulatory position on ambient recording in a psychiatric consultation is not settled, which makes explicit consent and a clear record of it the minimum.
- Take consent for ambient recording explicitly and record that you did, separately from general consent to treatment
- Read the AI-generated mental state examination as unverified - there is no transcript to check it against
- Never sign off an AI-generated assessment and plan without rewriting the formulation yourself
- Check what the vendor retains, where it is stored, and whether the recording is deleted after the note is produced
- Offer the patient the option to decline recording without it affecting the consultation
Why it matters
The part of the note a clinician is least able to check is the part the tool is least able to produce.
Don't overread it
This is a personal view setting out a framework, not a study of scribe accuracy or of patient outcomes.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.
Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for psychiatry, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free