- Design
- Retrospective multi-cohort analysis with volume-of-tissue-activated and fibre-wise mapping
- Population
- 131 adults with treatment-resistant depression who received bilateral subcallosal cingulate DBS
- Primary outcome
- Response, at least 50% reduction in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score
- Effect
- Failure to activate the left cingulum bundle and medial uncinate fasciculus was associated with reduced benefit; no single effect size reported in the abstract
This retrospective analysis pooled 131 people with treatment-resistant depression who had bilateral subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation across three cohorts. Response was a drop of at least 50% on the 17-item Hamilton scale.
Using each patient's stimulation settings, the authors modelled the tissue activated and mapped it onto white matter tracts. Responders had a less variable pattern of activated tissue. Not activating the left cingulum bundle and the medial uncinate fasciculus was associated with weaker benefit.
The authors suggest connectome-guided targeting could outperform targeting by anatomical landmarks. That remains a hypothesis: the study was retrospective, used modelled rather than measured stimulation fields and did not compare targeting methods prospectively. It is relevant mainly to centres offering DBS, not to routine practice.
- DBS for depression remains a specialist, research-oriented treatment; this study does not widen the indication.
- Targeting precision may matter, according to this retrospective mapping.
- A prospective comparison of connectome-guided and landmark targeting is still needed.
- When counselling, describe benefit as uncertain and dependent on the centre and technique.
Why it matters
It points to why DBS results vary between patients and what a better-targeted trial could test.
Don't overread it
Retrospective and model-based; it does not show that connectome-guided targeting improves response.
The statistics, in plain English
A link between stimulated tracts and response in a retrospective dataset does not show that changing the target improves outcomes. Modelled fields are estimates, and patients were not randomised to targeting methods.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for psychiatry, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free