Turning on expiratory pressure relief left more apnoeas and did not improve adherence

Design

four-step randomised crossover study, in-laboratory polysomnography followed by home CPAP periods

Population

29 adults with severe obstructive sleep apnoea on nasal CPAP, mean age 63, median AHI 58 events/h

Primary outcome

upper airway patency (peak inspiratory flow) and CPAP efficacy with and without expiratory pressure alleviation

Effect

peak inspiratory flow 0.19 vs 0.38 L/s (P<0.001); residual AHI 3.7 vs 1.3 events/h on fixed CPAP (P<0.05)

Expiratory pressure alleviation is built into most CPAP devices and is routinely enabled to reduce the discomfort of breathing out against pressure. The physiological worry has always been that the pharynx can narrow or collapse during expiration, and that dropping the pressure at exactly that moment could undo the splint. This study tested it in four steps in 29 adults with severe obstructive sleep apnoea — median apnoea-hypopnoea index 58 events per hour, mean body mass index 37 — first during overnight polysomnography, then at home.

Activating expiratory pressure alleviation halved peak inspiratory flow during flow limitation: 0.19 L/s (0.15 to 0.23) against 0.38 (0.34 to 0.42), p<0.001. Manually titrated therapeutic pressure had to be higher with it enabled, 11.40 against 9.17 cmH2O, p<0.001. At home, residual apnoea-hypopnoea index was higher with the feature on during both fixed CPAP (3.7 against 1.3 events per hour) and auto-CPAP (1.4 against 0.8), both p<0.05. Adherence did not differ at all: about seven hours a night either way.

That last result removes the justification. The comfort algorithm is tolerated on the assumption that it buys adherence at some small cost to efficacy; here it cost efficacy and bought nothing. For a patient with persistent residual events on CPAP, checking whether the comfort feature is enabled is now a first-line troubleshooting step — and it is a setting most patients have never been told exists.

• Check whether expiratory pressure alleviation is enabled before increasing pressure for residual events
• Expect a lower therapeutic pressure to suffice once it is turned off
• Review the residual apnoea-hypopnoea index on the device download, not just the adherence hours
• Do not assume the comfort setting is buying adherence — it did not here
• Note this was severe obstructive sleep apnoea in a single centre; milder disease was not tested

Why it matters

A setting enabled by default to improve tolerance was worsening control without improving adherence at all.

Don't overread it

Twenty-nine patients with severe disease at one centre — this does not establish what happens in mild or moderate apnoea.

The statistics, in plain English

The flow difference is the mechanistic result and it is large and unambiguous, with non-overlapping ranges. The residual apnoea-hypopnoea index differences are smaller in absolute terms — 3.7 against 1.3 events per hour on fixed CPAP — and both numbers sit in the range many would call adequately controlled, so the clinical importance depends on the individual patient rather than the average. The adherence comparison is the one that changes the calculation: with p values around 0.5 and identical means, there is no trade-off to weigh.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.