DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 19 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Biologics helped smokers with severe asthma as much as never-smokers

Do not withhold a biologic from an eligible severe asthma patient only because they smoke or used to.

Design
Retrospective real-world registry study
Population
3,876 adults with severe asthma starting biologics in 16 European countries
Primary outcome
Change in control, exacerbations, quality of life and oral steroid use at 1 year
Effect
Improvements in all smoking groups; magnitude not significantly different

The European Respiratory Society's SHARP registry analysed 3,876 adults with severe asthma in 16 countries who started a biologic: 2,383 never-smokers, 1,352 former smokers and 141 current smokers. Outcomes were measured after one year.

In all groups, asthma control and quality of life improved, frequent exacerbations fell and oral steroid use dropped, and the size of improvement did not differ significantly by smoking status. A survey found that 29% of participating countries reported resistance to prescribing biologics to current smokers.

Registry data carry selection bias: smokers who were prescribed a biologic may have been the most typical eosinophilic responders. Current smokers were few. Still, the results argue against withholding a biologic solely because of smoking history when a patient meets the eligibility criteria. Smoking cessation remains part of the treatment, not a precondition.

  • Assess eligibility for biologics in severe asthma on phenotype and exacerbations, not smoking status alone.
  • Offer smoking cessation support alongside, not as a condition of, biologic therapy.
  • Consider overlapping COPD in heavy former smokers before attributing all symptoms to asthma.
  • Reassess response at one year using exacerbations, oral steroid use and control scores.

Why it matters

A common prescribing bias may be denying effective treatment to a group with severe disease.

Don't overread it

Registry data from selected patients; current smokers were few.

The statistics, in plain English

A non-significant difference between groups means the data did not detect a smaller response in smokers, not that responses were proven identical. With only 141 current smokers, a modest difference could be missed.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

ildasthmalungcancer

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for pulmonology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app