DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 27 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Ondansetron lowered respiratory drive in nine ventilated ARDS patients

Ondansetron is a hypothesis for managing excessive effort in ARDS, not yet a treatment.

Design
Single-centre, single-blind, non-randomised crossover physiological study
Population
9 adults with ARDS ventilated over 48 hours on pressure support
Primary outcome
Inspiratory pressure-time product per minute
Effect
108 to 85 cmH2O·s/min; difference −23 (95% CI −28 to −18)

Excessive respiratory effort in ARDS may worsen lung injury, and serotonin acting on pulmonary C-fibre 5-HT3 receptors is one driver. This single-centre, single-blind, non-randomised crossover study gave nine ventilated ARDS patients on pressure support intravenous placebo, then ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg three hours later.

After ondansetron, the inspiratory pressure-time product fell from 108 to 85 cmH2O·s/min (difference −23, 95% CI −28 to −18). Respiratory rate, minute ventilation and diaphragm electrical activity all fell, tidal volume did not change, PaCO2 rose by about 3 mmHg and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved by 23.

This is a physiological proof of concept: nine patients, fixed order, no clinical outcomes. It suggests a widely available, inexpensive drug might reduce harmful effort without deep sedation or paralysis, but that is a hypothesis for a randomised trial, not a reason to use ondansetron this way now.

  • Ondansetron reduced inspiratory effort and respiratory rate in this small physiological study.
  • Tidal volume was unchanged, so the effect was not simply sedation.
  • PaCO2 rose slightly; watch for this in patients where carbon dioxide matters.
  • Do not use ondansetron to control respiratory drive outside a trial yet.

Why it matters

It points to a cheap way to allow spontaneous breathing more safely, if trials confirm it.

Don't overread it

Nine patients in a non-randomised, fixed-order design cannot show clinical benefit or safety.

The statistics, in plain English

The narrow confidence intervals reflect many repeated measurements in each of nine patients, not a large sample. Because placebo always came first, time effects cannot be separated from the drug effect.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

ildrespcriticalinterventionasthma

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for pulmonology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app