- Design
- Retrospective multicentre cohort, four Danish university hospitals
- Population
- 1,145 patients aged over 2 with normal findings at laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis
- Primary outcome
- Repeat diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis
- Effect
- 3.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 4.9) after appendix left; subsequent appendicitis 0.96%
A Danish multicentre retrospective cohort study in the World Journal of Surgery, published on 19 September, compared 627 patients whose macroscopically normal appendix was left in place at diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis with 518 who had it removed. Median follow-up was more than five years.
In the group who kept the appendix, 3.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 4.9) had a second diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis, a median of 1.7 years later, and about 1% went on to have appendicitis. In the main analysis there was no difference in later abdominal surgery, endoscopy or surgical complications. In sensitivity analyses, complications were more frequent after removal (3.7% vs 1.6%).
Many guidelines advise removing a normal-looking appendix when no other cause is found, to avoid future diagnostic confusion. This study suggests the cost of leaving it is small. It is observational, and the choice to leave or remove was the surgeon's, so the groups may differ.
- If the appendix looks normal and no other cause is found, discuss in advance with the patient whether it will be removed.
- Document clearly in the operation note and discharge letter whether the appendix was left in place.
- Explain to patients who keep a normal appendix that a later episode of right iliac fossa pain may still be appendicitis.
- Inspect the pelvis and terminal ileum before deciding the laparoscopy is negative.
Why it matters
It questions the routine removal of a normal appendix, which adds operative risk for a small diagnostic benefit later.
Don't overread it
Observational and surgeon-selected; it has not changed guidelines that favour removal.
The statistics, in plain English
3.5% with a confidence interval of 2.0% to 4.9% means roughly 1 in 30 patients returned for a second look over about five years. The complication difference appeared only in sensitivity analyses, so it is weaker than the main result.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for general surgery, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free