DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 12 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 06

Nerve-sparing prostatectomy in high-risk cancer: similar early margins and recurrence, fewer pads

Consider nerve sparing for carefully selected men with high-risk prostate cancer when preoperative planning supports it, and tell them cancer control beyond a year is not known.

Design
Retrospective single-centre cohort (STROBE-reported), robotic prostatectomy 2021 to 2022
Population
1,385 men; 262 with two or more STAMPEDE high-risk features
Primary outcome
Positive margins, 12-month biochemical recurrence and continence by nerve-sparing status
Effect
Margins 21.3% vs 23.2% (P = 0.72); biochemical recurrence 6.7% vs 5.4% (P = 0.9); fewer pads with nerve sparing (P = 0.03)

A single-centre retrospective cohort of 1,385 men having robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2021 and 2022 within a structured patient-specific planning pathway was stratified by the number of STAMPEDE-defined high-risk features. Overall, 75.4% had nerve-sparing surgery. In the 262 men with two or more high-risk features, 57.3% had some nerve sparing.

In that group, positive surgical margin rates were 21.3% with nerve-sparing and 23.2% without (P = 0.72), and 12-month biochemical recurrence was 6.7% versus 5.4% (P = 0.9). Continence at three and twelve months was similar, but nerve-sparing patients used fewer pads at twelve months (P = 0.03).

Surgeons chose which men had nerve sparing, so those with more favourable disease on imaging and examination were probably selected. Twelve months is too short to judge cancer control. The authors call for prospective evaluation.

  • 57.3% of men with two or more high-risk features had some nerve sparing.
  • Margins and 12-month biochemical recurrence were similar.
  • Pad use at 12 months was lower with nerve sparing.
  • Selection by the surgeon and 12-month follow-up limit conclusions.
  • Selection relied on structured imaging-based planning.

Why it matters

High-risk disease is usually treated as a reason to give up on nerve sparing, and this challenges that default in selected men.

Don't overread it

A retrospective single-centre cohort with surgeon selection and 12-month follow-up cannot show oncological safety.

The statistics, in plain English

P values of 0.72 and 0.9 show no detectable difference in a modest sample of 262 men, which is not proof of equivalence. Biochemical recurrence at 12 months misses most eventual recurrences.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

uroutipaedurologyprostatecancerincontinenceurobladdercancer

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for urology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app