- Design
- Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials (abridged update)
- Population
- 6 RCTs, 789,086 men without prior prostate cancer
- Primary outcome
- Prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality
- Effect
- Cancer-specific RR 0.87 (0.80-0.95); all-cause RR 0.99 (0.97-1.00)
An abridged update of the Cochrane review (BJU International, 1 October 2026) included six randomised trials with 789,086 men followed for 3 to 23 years; five tested PSA alone, and one (ProScreen) PSA with a kallikrein panel and MRI.
Based mainly on the ERSPC trial in a risk-of-bias sensitivity analysis, screening likely reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95; moderate certainty) - about two fewer deaths per 1,000 men screened. Across four trials, screening may slightly reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 0.97-1.00; low certainty), an interval that includes no effect. There was little or no difference in screening-related adverse events. ProScreen increased detection, and its mortality results are not yet mature.
The review moves the evidence from 'no clear benefit' in 2013 to a likely, modest benefit. That supports offering informed, shared decisions about screening rather than either routine testing or discouragement, and the balance with overdiagnosis still needs explaining.
- Offer men a shared decision about PSA screening, explaining a likely benefit of about 2 fewer deaths per 1,000
- Explain overdiagnosis and the possibility of treating a cancer that would never have caused harm
- Use MRI before biopsy where available to reduce unnecessary biopsies
- Follow your national guidance on screening ages and intervals
Why it matters
The best summary of screening trials now finds a likely mortality benefit, which shifts how screening conversations should be framed.
Don't overread it
A modest, moderate-certainty benefit on cancer deaths - not proof screening extends overall life.
The statistics, in plain English
An RR of 0.87 means about 13% fewer prostate cancer deaths, which against a baseline of 16 per 1,000 is about 2 per 1,000. The all-cause mortality interval reaches 1.00, so a real effect on overall survival is uncertain. Certainty ratings reflect bias and inconsistency across the trials.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for urology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free