DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 20 September 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 06

Esketamine moved day-one pulmonary complications and then the effect vanished

Not a reason to change your thoracic anaesthetic; wait for a larger trial with a durable endpoint.

Design
randomised, double-blind controlled trial
Population
80 adults undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer
Primary outcome
incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications on postoperative day 1
Effect
37.5% with esketamine vs 72.5% control (P = .002); no difference at day 3 or 7 or in any secondary outcome

Eighty adults having thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer were randomised, double-blind, to perioperative esketamine or control. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications on day 1.

That outcome moved substantially: 37.5 per cent with esketamine against 72.5 per cent without (P = .002). Nothing else did. Pulmonary complications at days 3 and 7, complication severity score, nausea and vomiting, length of stay, drain duration, 24-hour resting pain score, unplanned intensive care admission and mortality were all unchanged.

That pattern deserves scepticism. A difference that exists on day 1 and not on day 3 in the same patients suggests either a transient effect on how complications were detected — atelectasis on an early film, for instance — or chance in a trial of 40 per arm. A 72.5 per cent day-one complication rate in the control group is also very high, which raises questions about the definition used. This is a signal worth a larger trial with a clinically anchored endpoint, not a reason to add esketamine to a thoracic anaesthetic.

  • Do not add esketamine to thoracic anaesthesia on this evidence
  • When reading a trial like this, check whether the effect persists past the first measurement
  • Note the control-group event rate — 72.5 per cent suggests a broad complication definition
  • Keep lung-protective ventilation and early mobilisation as the interventions with outcome evidence

Why it matters

It is a clean illustration of why a day-one surrogate is not a pulmonary complication.

Don't overread it

A single-centre trial of 80 patients with a positive primary outcome that did not persist and no secondary outcome supporting it.

The statistics, in plain English

With 40 patients per arm, a single significant result among many outcomes is what chance produces regularly. The disappearance of the effect by day 3 is the important detail: a real reduction in pulmonary complications would not resolve in 48 hours while the patients were still in hospital.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

acutepainperioperativepaedanaesregionalanaes

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for anaesthesiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app