DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 31 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 06

Primary-prevention ICDs in nonischaemic HFrEF: fewer sudden deaths, unclear mortality gain

Individualise primary-prevention ICDs in nonischaemic HFrEF; the reduction in sudden death is clear, the overall survival gain is not.

Design
Rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Population
Six RCTs of patients with nonischaemic HFrEF
Primary outcome
Sudden cardiac death, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality
Effect
SCD RR 0.41 (0.26–0.65); CV death RR 0.75 (0.59–0.95); all-cause RR 0.88 (0.72–1.07)

A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis pooled six pivotal randomised trials of primary-prevention ICDs in nonischaemic HFrEF.

ICDs lowered sudden cardiac death (RR 0.41) and cardiovascular death (RR 0.75), both rated high certainty. All-cause mortality was not significantly lower (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72–1.07). Trials with shorter follow-up showed a mortality benefit, which is consistent with background therapy improving over time and leaving less sudden death to prevent.

That pattern fits the debate since DANISH: in a patient on full modern therapy, competing non-sudden deaths dilute the device's effect. The decision is individual — age, comorbidity, scar on MRI and response to treatment all weigh in.

  • Optimise guideline-directed medical therapy for at least three months before deciding on an ICD.
  • Weigh age and competing causes of death, which narrow the benefit.
  • Consider cardiac MRI for scar when the decision is close.
  • Discuss with the patient that the device prevents sudden death rather than extending life overall.

Why it matters

The case for a routine ICD weakens as medical therapy reduces the sudden deaths it exists to prevent.

Don't overread it

The mortality benefit with shorter follow-up is a subgroup result and should not be taken as the headline.

The statistics, in plain English

An RR of 0.88 with an interval from 0.72 to 1.07 crosses 1, so the data are compatible with a modest benefit or none. The subgroup split by follow-up length is hypothesis-generating.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

heartfailureafibephtncardiometabolicimagingstructural

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for cardiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app