DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 24 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

Type 1 diabetes still carried 3.7 times the mortality of matched peers, and the excess was larger in women

Treat young women with type 1 diabetes as carrying a relative mortality excess at least as great as men's, and review cardiovascular risk and hypoglycaemia safety in both.

Design
Retrospective registry cohort with 1:4 propensity-matched controls
Population
4,299 people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before age 35 (2000 to 2022) in an Israeli health network, and 17,196 controls
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality
Effect
HR 3.66 (95% CI 2.53 to 5.31); women HR 8.40 (3.71 to 19.04), men HR 2.90 (1.78 to 4.72)

This cohort drew on a validated registry in a large Israeli health network and matched each person diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before 35 to four people without diabetes of the same age and sex. Follow-up covered about 204,000 person-years and 112 deaths.

Type 1 diabetes was associated with mortality about 3.7 times higher than controls. The relative excess was much larger in women, though the absolute death rate remained higher in men because baseline male mortality is higher. People diagnosed after 2010 had a smaller excess than those diagnosed in the decade before.

The causes of death are not given in the abstract, so the study cannot say what drives the gap. It is a reminder that the survival disadvantage persists among young people in a well-resourced system, and that women are not protected.

  • Mortality was 131 per 100,000 person-years in type 1 diabetes against 35 in matched controls.
  • Relative excess was larger in women (HR 8.40) than in men (HR 2.90), though men died more often in absolute terms.
  • People diagnosed after 2010 had a smaller excess than those diagnosed in 2000 to 2010.
  • Use each review to check hypoglycaemia awareness, blood pressure, lipids and mental health, not only HbA1c.

Why it matters

Modern technology has narrowed but not closed the survival gap, and the relative burden falls more heavily on women than many clinicians assume.

The statistics, in plain English

A hazard ratio of 3.66 means deaths occurred at about 3.7 times the rate. The female estimate has a very wide interval (3.7 to 19) because there were few deaths, so the exact size is uncertain even though the direction is clear. Relative and absolute risk differ here: women had the larger relative excess, men the higher death rate.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

glp1obesitytype2type1pediatric

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for diabetes & endocrinology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app