- Design
- Retrospective cohort comparing POCUS with consultative echocardiography
- Population
- 194 ED patients with pulmonary embolism, 97 physician ultrasound operators
- Primary outcome
- Accuracy of POCUS for right-ventricular dysfunction vs consultative echo
- Effect
- Sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 85.9%, agreement 81.4% (kappa 0.63)
Right-ventricular dysfunction raises the risk in pulmonary embolism, but formal echocardiography is often slow to obtain. This study compared emergency-physician point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with cardiologist-read consultative echocardiography in 194 ED patients with PE, across 97 different physician operators.
Against consultative echo, POCUS was 76.8% sensitive and 85.9% specific for right-ventricular dysfunction, with 81.4% agreement (kappa 0.63), and it performed best when the dysfunction was moderate to severe. In other words, emergency physicians can reliably pick up the significant right-heart strain that drives escalation decisions.
The practice change is to use your own bedside scan to risk-stratify PE at presentation rather than waiting on a consultative study — while remembering that sensitivity of 77% means a normal POCUS does not exclude dysfunction, so confirm with formal echo when the stakes or suspicion are high.
- Emergency-physician POCUS was 77% sensitive and 86% specific for RV dysfunction in PE.
- Agreement with cardiologist echo was good and best for moderate-to-severe dysfunction.
- Use bedside POCUS to risk-stratify PE at presentation rather than awaiting formal echo.
- A normal POCUS does not exclude dysfunction — confirm with echo when suspicion is high.
Why it matters
It supports acting on your own ultrasound for PE risk stratification instead of waiting for a consultative echo.
Don't overread it
Retrospective, with 77% sensitivity and only moderate agreement — POCUS screens for RV dysfunction but cannot rule it out, especially when it is mild.
The statistics, in plain English
A sensitivity of 77% means roughly one in four cases of dysfunction is missed, so POCUS is better at confirming strain than excluding it; specificity of 86% means a positive scan is fairly trustworthy.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free