- Design
- Secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC randomised trial
- Population
- 1,328 critically ill children (newborn–17 years) not on renal replacement
- Primary outcome
- New infection and duration of PICU dependency, by urea-to-creatinine ratio
- Effect
- Higher first-week ratio: infection aOR 1.75 (1.35–2.27); 90-day mortality aOR 1.43 (1.03–1.99)
The PEPaNIC trial earlier showed that starting parenteral nutrition early in critically ill children — rather than waiting a week while enteral feeding is built up — increased infections and delayed recovery. This secondary analysis asks why.
In 1,328 children not on renal replacement, early parenteral nutrition raised urea and the urea-to-creatinine ratio over the first 11 days. A higher first-week urea-to-creatinine ratio independently tracked with more new infections (adjusted odds ratio 1.75 per 30 units), slower discharge from PICU and hospital, and higher 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.43), and statistically accounted for part of the harm.
The reading is that the amino-acid load of early parenteral nutrition can exceed what a sick child can metabolise, and that urea may flag it. The practical point stands with or without the mechanism: do not rush to supplement feeding with parenteral nutrition in the first week of paediatric critical illness, and watch a climbing urea as a possible warning.
- Early parenteral nutrition raised urea and the urea-to-creatinine ratio in critically ill children.
- A higher first-week ratio tracked with more infections, slower recovery and higher 90-day mortality.
- The rise statistically explained part of the harm from early parenteral nutrition.
- Avoid rushing parenteral nutrition in the first week of paediatric critical illness.
Why it matters
It gives a mechanism, and a cheap marker, for the established harm of early parenteral feeding in critically ill children.
The statistics, in plain English
These are associations within a randomised trial: the urea rise correlates with worse outcomes and partly explains the known harm, but urea as a monitoring tool still needs testing prospectively.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for emergency & critical care, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free