DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 30 September 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 04

A probiotic E. coli strain: fewer UTI recurrences in a pilot, but not significantly

Do not recommend E. coli Nissle 1917 for recurrent UTI yet; the pilot result was not significant.

Design
Pilot multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial
Population
50 women with recurrent uncomplicated UTI
Primary outcome
At least one microbiological recurrence over 26 weeks
Effect
16.7% v 42.3%, RR 0.39 (0.14–1.14), p = 0.089

A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in the Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia (28 September) randomised 50 women with recurrent uncomplicated UTI to Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, a probiotic strain, or placebo, and followed them for 26 weeks.

At least one culture-proven recurrence occurred in 4 of 24 women on the probiotic and 11 of 26 on placebo (16.7% v 42.3%; RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.14). The difference was not statistically significant. Positive cultures at 12 weeks were also less common (8.3% v 23.1%), and one quality-of-life domain improved. Side effects were mild and gastrointestinal.

The signal is worth a proper trial — non-antibiotic prevention is exactly what women with recurrent UTI and their GPs want. But a 50-woman pilot that missed significance is not a basis for prescribing. Established options remain the ones to discuss.

  • E. coli Nissle 1917 is not yet an evidence-based option for recurrent UTI prevention.
  • Discuss established measures first: hydration, post-coital voiding and vaginal oestrogen after menopause.
  • Where prophylaxis is needed, weigh antibiotic and non-antibiotic options with the patient.
  • Watch for adequately powered trials before recommending this probiotic.

Why it matters

Patients ask about probiotics for recurrent UTI, and this is the evidence behind the question.

Don't overread it

A pilot of 50 women with a non-significant primary result does not show the probiotic works.

The statistics, in plain English

A relative risk of 0.39 would mean 61% fewer recurrences, but with only 50 women the interval runs from 0.14 to 1.14 — including no effect. A pilot trial is designed to test feasibility, not to prove benefit.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

commoninfectionpreventionscreening

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for family medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app