- Design
- Qualitative evidence synthesis with reflexive thematic analysis
- Population
- 32 qualitative studies, 677 primary care practitioners internationally
- Primary outcome
- Practitioners' views and experiences of managing UTIs
- Effect
- Five themes; uncertainty concentrated in children, men, older adults and recurrent UTI
A qualitative evidence synthesis in the British Journal of General Practice (21 September) brought together 32 studies reporting the views of 677 primary care practitioners on managing urinary tract infections. Study quality was rated high.
Five themes emerged. Practitioners felt confident with the typical case — a young woman with classic symptoms. Confidence fell when 'patient X' arrived: children, men, older people and women with recurrent infection, where the diagnosis is less certain and the stakes of under- or over-treating are higher. Weighing antibiotic benefit against resistance was a constant tension, sharpened by time pressure, staffing shortages and patients expecting a prescription. The relationship with the patient was what often decided the outcome.
This is not evidence about which treatment works, but it names where decisions go wrong. The atypical groups are exactly where a structured approach — a urine culture before antibiotics, a short safety-net plan, a follow-up call — protects both patient and prescriber.
- In children, men, older adults and recurrent UTI, send a urine culture before starting antibiotics.
- Give a clear safety-net plan for fever, loin pain or no improvement within 48 hours.
- Discuss expectations about antibiotics openly; a delayed prescription can suit mild cases in women.
- Record the reasoning when you do not follow the usual pathway.
Why it matters
It shows the uncertainty lies with specific patient groups, which is where a structured approach helps most.
The statistics, in plain English
Qualitative syntheses describe experiences and reasons, not rates or effects. They are useful for understanding why practice varies, not for deciding which treatment works.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for family medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free