DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 30 September 2026 edition

Practice changer · 05 of 05

Mpox antigen tests: a positive helps, a negative does not rule out

Treat a negative mpox rapid antigen test as uninformative when lesions look typical, and confirm by PCR.

Design
Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study against PCR
Population
Lesion swabs from 190 patients with suspected mpox, Kinshasa province, DR Congo
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and specificity of five antigen rapid tests
Effect
Best test: sensitivity 77.3% (68.0–84.5), specificity 93.5% (86.6–97.0); lowest sensitivity 39.2%

Where mpox PCR is unavailable, antigen-based rapid tests are an obvious stopgap. A diagnostic accuracy study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, published on 25 May, tested five of them against PCR on lesion swabs from 190 patients with suspected mpox in Kinshasa province, DR Congo, where clade Ib circulates.

The best-performing test detected 77.3% of PCR-positive cases (95% CI 68.0 to 84.5) with 93.5% specificity; a second was similar at 72.2%. The others ranged down to 39.2% sensitivity, all with specificity of 93–97%. In a high-prevalence setting like this, a positive result is therefore likely to be real; a negative result misses at least a quarter of infections even with the best test.

For clinicians outside the outbreak area, including in India, PCR remains the test to use for suspected mpox. Where a rapid test is all that is available, act on a positive, but keep isolating and seek PCR for a patient with typical lesions and a negative rapid test. Performance will be lower where mpox is rare, because positive predictive value falls with prevalence.

  • Use PCR on a lesion swab as the diagnostic test for suspected mpox wherever it is available.
  • A positive antigen test in a high-prevalence setting can support diagnosis when PCR is not available.
  • A negative antigen test does not rule out mpox; keep isolation and seek PCR if lesions are typical.
  • Rapid tests differ widely; sensitivity ranged from 39% to 77% across five products.

Why it matters

A falsely reassuring negative test could send an infectious patient home.

Don't overread it

Performance was measured in a high-prevalence clade Ib setting; accuracy elsewhere and with other clades may differ.

The statistics, in plain English

Sensitivity of 77% means 23 of every 100 true infections test negative. Specificity of 93.5% means about 6 of every 100 people without mpox test positive. How much a positive result can be trusted depends on how common mpox is locally: in an outbreak it is high, where mpox is rare many positives would be false.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

vaccinesrespiratoryinfsepsistboutbreak

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for infectious diseases, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app