- Design
- Single-centre retrospective cohort, US Veterans Affairs hepatology clinics, 2020 to 2025
- Population
- 608 adults with steatotic liver disease (controlled attenuation parameter above 263 dB/m)
- Primary outcome
- Receipt of alcohol treatment among those with mild-to-moderate or hazardous alcohol use
- Effect
- 13.4% received treatment over a median 27.1 months; 14.5% had hazardous use
This single-centre cohort looked at 608 adults with steatotic liver disease (defined by a controlled attenuation parameter above 263 dB/m) seen in hepatology clinics at a US Veterans Affairs system between 2020 and 2025. Most were men, with a mean age of 63.9 years.
Alcohol screening with AUDIT-C within six months of elastography was done in 91.6%. Of these, 46.3% reported no alcohol, 39.1% mild-to-moderate use and 14.5% hazardous use. Among those with any alcohol use, only 13.4% received pharmacotherapy or other alcohol treatment services over a median follow-up of 27.1 months. Receiving treatment was associated with a fall in AUDIT-C scores.
This is a single-centre, mostly male, observational study, and the link between treatment and lower scores could reflect who accepted treatment. The practical message is a process one: screening was done, but the step after a positive screen was often missing.
- Screen for alcohol with a validated tool such as AUDIT-C in every patient with steatotic liver disease.
- After a positive screen, offer brief intervention and linkage to treatment, and discuss medicines for alcohol use disorder where appropriate.
- Document the follow-up plan so the screen leads to an action.
- Reassess AUDIT-C at later visits to see whether drinking has changed.
Why it matters
The gap was not in detecting drinking but in doing something about it.
Don't overread it
This is a single-centre observational study in a mostly male veteran population, so the proportions may not apply to other settings.
The statistics, in plain English
The 13.4% is a proportion of the people with any alcohol use who got any treatment. The association with falling scores is not evidence that treatment caused the fall, because patients who engage may differ from those who do not.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for internal medicine, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free