DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 26 September 2026 edition

Research · 04 of 06

A quantitative zone map made ROP zoning far more consistent between readers

Standardised zone overlays can make ROP treatment decisions more consistent; watch for validated tools for tele-ROP.

Design
Retrospective crossover reader study
Population
85 ROP examinations graded by 4 ophthalmologists
Primary outcome
Agreement on zone classification and ETROP decisions
Effect
Reader–reference kappa 0.58 → 0.92; interobserver 0.47 → 0.86

This Chinese reader study, published 3 September in the British Journal of Ophthalmology, built an anatomical reference map for retinopathy of prematurity zones from optic disc–fovea distance and overlaid it on RetCam panoramic images using deep-learning registration. Four ophthalmologists graded 85 examinations with and without the map.

Agreement with the reference standard for zone rose from kappa 0.58 to 0.92, and agreement between readers from 0.47 to 0.86. For Zone III versus not Zone III, agreement rose from 0.40 to 0.88. In 20 zone-dependent treatment decisions, agreement improved from 0.85 to complete concordance.

Zone assignment drives treatment under ETROP, and it is notoriously subjective at the periphery. A reproducible map matters most in screening programmes relying on wide-field imaging and remote reading, as many Indian ROP programmes do.

  • ROP zone assignment is unreliable between readers, especially at the Zone II/III border.
  • An anatomical overlay on wide-field images substantially improved agreement.
  • Better zone agreement led to more consistent ETROP treatment decisions.
  • Consider such tools for tele-ROP programmes where images are read remotely.

Why it matters

A mis-zoned eye can be treated too late or unnecessarily.

Don't overread it

Retrospective reader study with four graders; it has not been tested in live screening or shown to change outcomes.

The statistics, in plain English

Kappa measures agreement beyond chance; a rise from 0.47 to 0.86 moves from moderate to near-excellent agreement. The treatment-decision result rests on only 20 observations.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

glaucomapaedophthretina

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app