- Design
- Retrospective observational study at two neuro-ophthalmology centres
- Population
- 80 patients with biopsy-proven GCA and 179 with NAION
- Primary outcome
- Prevalence of PAMM on OCT
- Effect
- 28% in GCA vs 0% in NAION (P < .001); 29% in GCA without visual symptoms
A retrospective study from two tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practices (British Journal of Ophthalmology, 30 September 2026) looked for paracentral acute middle maculopathy, a band of ischaemia in the middle retinal layers on OCT, in 80 patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis and 179 with non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.
PAMM was present in 28% of the giant cell arteritis group and in none of the NAION group. It appeared in 33% of those with persistent visual symptoms, 8% with transient symptoms and 29% of those with no visual symptoms at all. It persisted after steroids had been started, and was not linked to presenting acuity or field loss.
This turns a routine macular OCT into a useful clue. In an older patient with optic disc swelling, PAMM points strongly away from NAION. In a patient with suspected arteritis and normal vision, it can reveal retinal ischaemia that would otherwise be missed. Its absence does not exclude arteritis, because most patients with arteritis did not have it.
- Perform macular OCT in suspected anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, and look for PAMM.
- Treat PAMM in an older patient with disc swelling as a strong pointer to giant cell arteritis.
- Do not use the absence of PAMM to rule out arteritis; about seven in ten patients with it had none.
- Do not delay steroids for imaging; PAMM persisted after treatment started, so OCT can be done afterwards.
Why it matters
It adds a quick, non-invasive test to the urgent question of whether a swollen disc is arteritic.
Don't overread it
A retrospective series from referral centres; specificity in routine practice needs confirming.
The statistics, in plain English
Finding PAMM in 0 of 179 NAION patients suggests very high specificity, but the true figure could still be a few per cent. Sensitivity was only 28%, so the sign helps when present and says little when absent.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free