- Design
- Secondary analysis of a multicentre, double-masked randomised clinical trial
- Population
- 1,097 individuals (1,421 eyes) having DMEK, 95.2% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy
- Primary outcome
- One-year graft success, endothelial cell loss and morphometry by donor diabetes severity
- Effect
- Graft success 97.1% (donor HbA1c below 6.5%) versus 93.0% to 97.4% in higher bands, P = 0.72
This secondary analysis of the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, a multicentre double-masked trial at 28 US sites, included 1,097 patients (1,421 eyes, 95.2% with Fuchs dystrophy) having low- to moderate-risk Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Donor corneas, with or without diabetes, were allocated about 2 to 1 by minimisation.
One-year graft success was 97.1% (95% CI 95.4% to 98.4%) with donors whose postmortem HbA1c was below 6.5%, 97.4% for 6.5% to below 7.5%, 93.0% for 7.5% to below 9.0%, and 95.8% for 9.0% or higher (P = 0.72). Endothelial cell density, cell-size variability and hexagonality did not differ. Donor diabetes severity score and measures of advanced glycation and oxidation end products were also not associated with outcomes.
The authors conclude the results support using corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty without extra testing or risk stratification. The one-year horizon is short for graft survival, and the highest HbA1c groups were small, with wide intervals.
- One-year graft success was 93.0% to 97.4% across donor HbA1c bands (P = 0.72).
- Endothelial cell density and morphology did not differ by donor diabetes severity.
- Most recipients had Fuchs dystrophy with low- to moderate-risk surgery.
- The highest-HbA1c donor groups were small (86 and 48 eyes).
- Longer follow-up is needed to confirm graft survival.
Why it matters
Donor diabetes is common and could shrink an already limited cornea supply if it were an unnecessary exclusion.
Don't overread it
One-year outcomes in low- to moderate-risk recipients do not show long-term graft survival or safety in high-risk eyes.
The statistics, in plain English
A P value of 0.72 means no detectable difference, not proof of none. With only 48 eyes in the highest HbA1c group and 93.0% in one band, the data cannot exclude a modest difference in those subgroups.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free