DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 15 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

A multipoint defocus lens held its own against a lenslet design for myopia

Consider myopia-control spectacle lenses for progressing childhood myopia; the newer design looks comparable at one year.

Design
Randomised non-inferiority trial, one-year interim analysis
Population
194 children aged 8–13 with myopia −0.75 to −4.5 D
Primary outcome
Change in spherical equivalent refraction
Effect
−0.74 D vs −0.60 D; difference −0.09 D (97% CI −0.26 to 0.09)

This Chinese non-inferiority trial randomised 194 children aged 8 to 13 with myopia of −0.75 to −4.5 D to partition multipoint defocus optics lenses or highly aspherical lenslet lenses, an established myopia-control spectacle design. This is the one-year interim analysis of a two-year trial.

After a year, refraction changed by −0.74 D with the new lens and −0.60 D with the lenslet lens, and axial length grew by 0.26 mm and 0.19 mm. The difference in refraction change was −0.09 D (97% CI −0.26 to 0.09), within the −0.3 D non-inferiority margin.

The point estimates slightly favoured the established lens, and there was no single-vision control, so the absolute effect of the new lens is not known. The final two-year result is what matters.

For families, the wider message holds: myopia-control spectacle lenses are a practical option alongside low-dose atropine and outdoor time. Cost and availability in India vary.

  • Offer a myopia-control option to children with progressing myopia, not just single-vision glasses
  • Encourage at least two hours of outdoor time a day
  • Measure axial length where available to track progression
  • Wait for the two-year result before favouring the newer lens design

Why it matters

It adds an option to the growing set of spectacle designs for slowing myopia.

Don't overread it

This is a one-year interim result of a two-year trial, with no single-vision control group.

The statistics, in plain English

Non-inferiority means the new lens was not worse than the comparator by more than 0.3 D. The confidence interval (−0.26 to 0.09) stays inside that margin, but the axial length figures leaned slightly towards the established lens.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

corneapaedophthglaucomacataractsurg

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app