- Design
- PRISMA-ScR scoping review, protocol registered, two independent reviewers
- Population
- 24 studies, 371 children under 18 undergoing epiglottopexy, published 1987 to 2026 across 10 countries
- Primary outcome
- indications, techniques, outcomes and complications of paediatric epiglottopexy
- Effect
- consistent respiratory improvement, swallowing largely preserved or improved, low complication and recurrence rates, single-procedure success in most cases
A PRISMA-ScR scoping review searched from 1980 to May 2026 and found 24 studies covering 371 children who underwent epiglottopexy, from 10 countries — case reports, case series and retrospective cohorts, with no controlled trials.
The techniques vary: endoscopic CO₂ laser or cautery-assisted glossoepiglottopexy, transoral suture-based epiglottopexy, transcervical external fixation, and robot-assisted approaches. The indications have widened. Alongside classic Type III laryngomalacia and epiglottic prolapse complicating tracheostomy-dependent or syndromic airway disease, the review documents a growing group: children with refractory obstructive sleep apnoea in whom drug-induced sleep endoscopy shows epiglottic obstruction. Across the literature, respiratory improvement was consistent, swallowing was largely preserved or improved, and complications and recurrence were low with single-procedure success in most cases.
The evidence base is the problem, and the authors say so — small retrospective series, no standardised outcome measures, short follow-up. What the review supports is that epiglottic obstruction on sleep endoscopy is worth looking for in a child whose apnoea persists after adenotonsillectomy, because there is now a procedure that addresses it.
- Consider drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children with obstructive sleep apnoea persisting after adenotonsillectomy
- Look specifically for sleep-state-dependent epiglottic collapse, which wakeful endoscopy will miss
- Discuss epiglottopexy as an option with honest framing — the evidence is case series, not trials
- Assess and document swallowing before and after; preservation is reported but not measured consistently
- Record outcomes prospectively if you do these — the literature needs it
Why it matters
It names a cause of persistent paediatric apnoea that standard assessment does not detect.
Don't overread it
A scoping review of 24 uncontrolled studies — safety and efficacy are 'consistently reported', not demonstrated against a comparator.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for ent & head and neck surgery, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free