- Design
- Pan-cancer concordance study, NGS vs IHC with FISH and RNA-seq validation
- Population
- 2409 tumours with whole-exome sequencing (EXOMA2), IHC subset
- Primary outcome
- Concordance of MTAP IHC with genomic classification
- Effect
- High concordance for wild-type and homozygous deletion; IHC reclassified a substantial share of heterozygous calls as homozygous loss
MTAP deletion, usually alongside CDKN2A loss, is becoming a therapeutic biomarker because MTAP-deficient tumours are vulnerable to PRMT5 and MAT2A inhibitors now in trials. Sequencing detects it, but copy-number calls can be indeterminate.
This study took 2409 tumours from the EXOMA2 whole-exome programme and classified MTAP as wild-type, homozygously deleted or probably heterozygously deleted. A subset was tested with three MTAP antibody clones, with FISH and RNA sequencing in selected cases. IHC agreed closely with NGS for wild-type and homozygous deletion. For heterozygous calls, IHC showed loss of protein in a substantial proportion, and FISH confirmed homozygous deletion in these. The ambiguous calls were not driven by low tumour cellularity.
For laboratories, the message is that a heterozygous or borderline MTAP call on NGS should not be taken at face value. IHC is cheap, quick and widely available, and should be the next step, with FISH where IHC is equivocal.
- Treat a heterozygous or borderline MTAP call on sequencing as unresolved
- Use MTAP IHC to clarify it; loss of expression suggested homozygous deletion confirmed by FISH
- Do not assume an ambiguous call reflects low tumour content; cellularity did not explain it here
- Report MTAP status explicitly where patients may be eligible for PRMT5 or MAT2A inhibitor trials
- Validate the chosen MTAP clone locally before diagnostic use
Why it matters
MTAP status may soon decide eligibility for a new drug class, so equivocal NGS reports will have consequences.
Don't overread it
PRMT5 and MAT2A inhibitors are still investigational; MTAP status does not yet select an approved treatment.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free