- Design
- Single-institution descriptive cohort of molecularly verified tumours
- Population
- 108 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (54 primary, 54 metastatic) with concurrent immunohistochemistry
- Primary outcome
- Immunostaining patterns correlated with architecture and driver mutations
- Effect
- Cytokeratin 7 positive in 30% (diffuse 16%); CA9 negative in 15% of metastases
The classic immunoprofile of clear cell renal cell carcinoma — CA9 positive, cytokeratin 7 negative — is built from morphologically selected tumours, and aberrant staining is a recognised trap. This study profiled 108 molecularly verified cases, identified by VHL alteration or 3p loss, correlating stains with architecture and driver mutations.
Cytokeratin 7 was positive in 30% overall, with diffuse strong staining in 16% — more common in primary than metastatic tumours (45% vs 13%), in lower-grade architecture, and in PBRM1 wild-type tumours. CA9, usually diffuse, was negative in 15% of metastatic tumours. Genotype tracked with phenotype: PBRM1-mutated tumours tended to be cytokeratin 7 negative, CA9 positive and PAX8 negative, while BAP1-mutated tumours showed higher-grade architecture and loss of CD10.
The practical message is to expect deviation from the textbook panel, especially in metastatic or higher-grade tumours. A cytokeratin 7-positive or CA9-negative renal tumour does not exclude clear cell carcinoma, and a molecular check resolves the genuinely ambiguous case.
- 108 molecularly verified clear cell renal cell carcinomas, correlated with architecture and mutations.
- Cytokeratin 7 was positive in 30% (diffuse strong in 16%), more often in primary and lower-grade tumours.
- CA9 was negative in 15% of metastatic tumours, against its usual diffuse positivity.
- PBRM1-mutated tumours tended to be cytokeratin 7 negative, CA9 positive, PAX8 negative.
- A cytokeratin 7-positive or CA9-negative renal tumour does not exclude clear cell carcinoma.
Why it matters
It quantifies how often the standard renal immunopanel misleads, which matters most on a small biopsy of a metastasis.
Don't overread it
This is a single-institution descriptive cohort; the genotype-phenotype associations are correlations, not diagnostic rules.
The statistics, in plain English
These proportions describe how often real tumours deviate from the expected panel; the associations with mutation status are significant but descriptive, showing correlation rather than a rule you can apply to a single case.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free