- Design
- Retrospective institutional cohort with IHC–NGS comparison subset
- Population
- 5,233 NSCLC with 447-gene NGS; 105 cases tested by both methods
- Primary outcome
- MTAP deletion frequency and IHC–NGS concordance
- Effect
- Homozygous deletion 5.6%; concordance 97.3% after excluding tumour content ≤30%
MTAP loss creates a metabolic vulnerability that newer targeted drugs aim to exploit, so laboratories will increasingly be asked to report it. This US institutional study reviewed 5,233 non-small cell lung cancers with NGS covering MTAP, and compared NGS with immunohistochemistry in 105 cases.
Homozygous MTAP deletion was found in 5.6%. It was commoner in adenocarcinomas from never or light smokers and in tumours with EGFR mutations or ALK fusions. After quality control and exclusion of samples with 30% tumour content or less, NGS and IHC agreed in 97.3%. About 13% of deficient cases stained heterogeneously. In the two discordant cases, one NGS call was wrong because of a complex genome, and one tumour had lost protein with no sequencing change.
IHC was the more sensitive test when tumour content was low or loss was subclonal. NGS also identified a partial deletion that could be misread without care.
For laboratories, MTAP IHC is a practical first test, especially on small biopsies, with NGS adding context on co-occurring drivers.
- Consider MTAP immunohistochemistry where tumour content is too low for reliable copy-number calls
- Treat NGS MTAP calls from samples with 30% tumour or less with caution
- Report heterogeneous MTAP staining explicitly; it occurred in about 13% of deficient cases
- Expect MTAP deletion alongside EGFR and ALK drivers, not only in smokers
Why it matters
MTAP status is likely to become a treatment-selection biomarker, and the two assays fail in different ways.
The statistics, in plain English
Concordance of 97.3% means the tests matched in all but a few of 105 cases, after excluding low-tumour samples. That figure applies to selected, quality-controlled material, not to every routine specimen.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free