The edition · Pathology
WHO soft tissue and bone tumour classification reaches a sixth edition, a three-marker panel tests lung carcinoid biopsies, and tumour content decides genomic profiling success
The sixth WHO classification of soft tissue and bone tumours adds 19 entities, an immunohistochemistry panel outperforms WHO grading for relapse risk in lung carcinoids, an H&E-derived score adds prognostic information in pancreatic cancer, and a Japanese audit shows why genomic profiling fails.
The edition in brief
The sixth edition of the WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours was drafted by 203 editors and authors from 27 countries. It adds 19 new entities, refines essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for different resource settings, and replaces the term variant with morphological pattern for features that do not change behaviour; it lists 116 soft tissue tumours, 46 bone tumours and 62 sarcomas in all. In a Dutch registry cohort of 98 resected lung neuroendocrine tumours with 19 relapses, a panel of OTP, CD44 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies flagged 89% of relapses as high risk against 11% for the WHO atypical carcinoid label, with higher interobserver agreement (kappa 0.673 against 0.276), though the cohort is small and retrospective. A nine-feature H&E image score (TIGERS) in resected pancreatic cancer improved the C-index in all six retrospective cohorts and gave a hazard ratio of 4.45 (95% CI 2.28-8.70) in a prospective cohort of 155, but its fixed cutoff failed to transfer to one external cohort, where 96.2% were called high risk. A single-centre audit of 371 FoundationOne CDx requests found 14.0% were cancelled before submission and 13.8% of returned results were only Qualified; low tumour content was the only independent predictor of failure.
WHO soft tissue and bone tumour classification, sixth edition: 19 new entities and 'morphological pattern' replaces 'variant'
Review your soft tissue and bone reporting templates and molecular referral routes against the new edition's entities and criteria.
OTP, CD44 and Ki-67 on preoperative biopsy flagged most lung carcinoid relapses that WHO grade missed
Consider discussing the OTP, CD44 and Ki-67 panel with your thoracic team as a research-stage adjunct, not a replacement for WHO grading.
An image score from routine H&E added prognostic information in resected pancreatic cancer
Treat H&E-derived risk scores as research tools; local calibration and prospective evidence are needed before they influence management.
Fixation time matters for breast biomarker testing
When a breast biomarker result looks wrong, check fixation and ischaemia time first.
Low tumour content was the only independent predictor of genomic profiling failure in a 371-request audit
Consider building a pre-submission check on tumour content and tissue volume into your genomic profiling workflow.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this one is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free