DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 19 October 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 05

Three tissue biomarkers failed validation in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma

c-MET, HLA class II and CD68 staining carried no prognostic value in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma and should not be reported for that purpose.

Design
Case-cohort biomarker study within the EORTC-GELA H9 randomised trial
Population
257 patients with early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma, 105 progression events
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival by c-MET, HLA class II and CD68 status
Effect
HR 0.75 (0.46-1.24), 0.85 (0.50-1.45) and 0.86 (0.52-1.44)

A case-cohort analysis of the EORTC-GELA H9 trial (PLOS ONE, 8 October 2026) tested immunohistochemistry for c-MET, HLA class II and CD68 in diagnostic tissue from 257 patients with early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma, with 105 progression events.

c-MET was expressed by tumour cells in 67% and cell-surface HLA class II in 51%. None of the three markers was associated with progression-free survival: hazard ratios 0.75 (95% CI 0.46-1.24) for c-MET, 0.85 (0.50-1.45) for HLA class II and 0.86 (0.52-1.44) for high CD68. Because none was significant alone, combinations were not analysed.

CD68 and macrophage counts in particular have long featured in Hodgkin prognostic discussions. This result, from trial material with a rigorous design, argues against adding them to routine reports for prognosis in early-stage disease. The authors note that risk-adapted treatment within the trial and scoring difficulty may have blunted any effect, and advanced-stage disease was not studied.

  • Do not report c-MET, HLA class II or CD68 as prognostic markers in early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Keep the diagnostic panel focused on confirming the diagnosis and excluding mimics
  • Treat prognostic biomarker claims in Hodgkin lymphoma as unvalidated until tested in trial cohorts
  • Note that this did not test advanced-stage disease

Why it matters

Stains often added to Hodgkin workups for prognosis did not hold up in trial material.

Don't overread it

Applies to early-stage disease treated within a risk-adapted trial; advanced stage was not studied.

The statistics, in plain English

All three hazard ratios have confidence intervals crossing 1.0, so no detectable association with progression. The intervals are fairly wide (roughly halving to a 45% rise in risk), so a modest effect cannot be ruled out, but nothing large enough to guide treatment.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

haemepathihcbiomarkersmoleculardigitalpath

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app