DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 25 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

FGFR2/3-altered intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a distinct small-duct subtype

Small-duct, non-mucinous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should prompt fusion-capable molecular testing for FGFR2.

Design
Retrospective single-institution genomic cohort
Population
90 genomically profiled intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas
Primary outcome
Clinicopathological features and survival by FGFR2/3 status
Effect
Small-duct 100% vs 32%; DSS HR 0.29 (0.09–0.95) univariate, HR 2.52 (0.14–45.07) adjusted

This retrospective study profiled 90 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing; 25 (28%) carried FGFR2 fusions, FGFR2 mutations or an FGFR3::TACC3 fusion.

FGFR2/3-altered tumours were all small-duct type, arose in younger patients (median 61 vs 68 years), were larger, more often well differentiated and rarely mucin-producing (16% vs 97% of wild-type). They had more BAP1 alterations, fewer TP53 mutations and no ARID1A or KRAS mutations. Disease-specific survival was better on univariate analysis (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.95) but not after adjustment (HR 2.52, 0.14–45.07).

The morphological profile — small-duct, non-mucinous, well differentiated — is a useful prompt for ensuring molecular testing is done, since FGFR inhibitors are a treatment option for these patients. The prognostic advantage appears to come from the accompanying features rather than FGFR status itself.

  • Ensure FGFR2 fusion testing for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, especially small-duct, non-mucinous tumours.
  • Use an RNA-based or fusion-capable assay; FGFR2 partners are numerous and varied.
  • Report histological subtype (small-duct vs large-duct) explicitly — it predicts the molecular profile.
  • Do not use FGFR status alone as a favourable prognostic marker.

Why it matters

Morphology can flag which cholangiocarcinomas are most likely to carry a targetable FGFR2 alteration.

Don't overread it

Single-centre, 90 cases; the survival difference did not survive multivariate analysis.

The statistics, in plain English

The survival advantage (HR 0.29) disappeared after adjustment for other factors, and the adjusted interval (0.14–45) is so wide it is uninformative. With 25 altered cases, the study cannot settle prognosis.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

classificationmolecularbiomarkers

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for pathology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app