- Design
- Cross-sectional cohort (EPIMex)
- Population
- 1004 young people with early-onset psychosis, 146 siblings, 1077 psychiatric controls, Mexico
- Primary outcome
- Seven cognitive functions and general cognitive ability (g)
- Effect
- Non-affective psychosis impaired on all measures (β 0.27–0.51); affective on most (β 0.13–0.25); siblings not impaired overall
The Early Psychosis Investigation in Mexico study tested seven cognitive functions in 1004 children and adolescents with early-onset psychosis, 146 of their siblings, and 1077 psychiatric controls without psychosis. Patients were split into affective psychosis (schizoaffective, psychotic depression or bipolar disorder; 695) and non-affective psychosis (schizophrenia and others; 309).
Non-affective patients were impaired on every measure (standardised β 0.27 to 0.51); affective patients on most, more mildly (0.13 to 0.25). Siblings as a group were not impaired. The gap grew with age: in non-affective psychosis it was small in children, medium in adolescents and large in young adults; in affective psychosis children showed none and adults a large gap; siblings showed a gap only in adulthood. Working memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency and processing speed carried the age-related differences.
The practical point is that cognition in a young person with psychosis is not a fixed baseline. It deserves assessment and re-assessment, and school and vocational plans should allow for it. Because this is a single cross-sectional sample, it cannot show that cognition declines within the same person over time.
- Assess cognition — working memory, verbal memory, processing speed — in young people with psychosis, not only positive symptoms.
- Repeat the assessment as they move from school to college or work, when demands on these functions rise.
- With the young person's (and guardian's) consent, explain to family and school that difficulty with memory and concentration is part of the illness, not lack of effort.
- Ask about academic decline in siblings too; a gap in adulthood was seen even without psychosis.
- Refer for cognitive remediation or educational support where it is available.
Why it matters
It suggests the cognitive gap in early-onset psychosis widens through adolescence — the window when education and work are decided.
Don't overread it
This was cross-sectional: it compares different people at different ages and cannot show decline within an individual.
The statistics, in plain English
A standardised β of 0.27 to 0.51 means patients scored roughly a quarter to a half of a standard deviation below controls — noticeable in daily functioning at the upper end. The 'age-associated deviation' is a larger gap in older participants than in younger ones in the same sample, not a measured change over time.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for psychiatry, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free