DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 24 October 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 05

Ianalumab in Sjögren's disease: a statistically significant but small fall in disease activity

Ianalumab narrowly reduced Sjögren's disease activity without improving symptoms; current management does not change.

Design
Two phase 3, 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trials
Population
779 patients with active Sjögren's disease (275 and 504)
Primary outcome
Change in ESSDAI at week 48
Effect
−1.3 (−2.6 to 0.0) and −1.0 (−2.0 to 0.0) vs placebo; no difference in symptom scores

NEPTUNUS-1 (275 patients) and NEPTUNUS-2 (504 patients) were 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ianalumab, a monoclonal antibody that both depletes B cells and blocks the BAFF receptor, in active Sjögren's disease.

Monthly 300 mg ianalumab reduced the ESSDAI disease activity score at week 48 more than placebo, by 1.3 points (95% CI −2.6 to 0.0) in NEPTUNUS-1 and 1.0 point (−2.0 to 0.0) in NEPTUNUS-2 — both just reaching significance. ESSDAI response rates and patient-reported symptom scores, including dryness and fatigue measures, did not differ. Serious adverse events were similar; injection reactions were more common with the drug.

On a scale running to 123, a 1-point difference is small, and patients did not feel better. Sjögren's disease has no approved targeted therapy, and this result is not yet a reason to change practice.

  • Continue symptomatic and organ-directed treatment for Sjögren's disease as now.
  • Explain to patients asking about ianalumab that trial benefit was small and did not improve dryness or fatigue scores.
  • Score systemic activity with ESSDAI to identify patients who might be candidates for future targeted therapy.
  • Watch for regulatory decisions before considering access.

Why it matters

A targeted drug met its phase 3 endpoint in a disease with none approved, yet patients did not feel better.

Don't overread it

The primary endpoint was met by a small margin with intervals touching zero, and key secondary endpoints were not.

The statistics, in plain English

A difference of about 1 point on a 0–123 scale, with an interval ending at 0, means the true effect could be close to nothing. Statistical significance here does not mean a difference patients would notice.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

lupusctdra

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for rheumatology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app