DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 11 October 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum at 8 mmHg did not clearly reduce pain after cholecystectomy

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is a reasonable option if exposure allows, but pain benefit is unproven.

Design
Randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
Population
160 adults having elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Primary outcome
Pain on a visual analogue scale at 6 hours
Effect
Median 3 vs 4 (p=0.221); paracetamol use 1.04 vs 1.35 (p=0.014, secondary)

A double-blind randomised trial in 160 patients having elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared 8 mmHg with 14 mmHg pneumoperitoneum. The primary outcome was pain on a visual analogue scale at 6 hours.

Median scores were 3 against 4 at 6 hours (p=0.221), 2 against 3 at 12 hours (p=0.074) and 1 against 2 at 24 hours (p=0.128), none significant. Mean paracetamol use in the first 24 hours was lower with low pressure, 1.04 against 1.35 doses (p=0.014). Operative time was similar and there were no conversions or major morbidity.

The trial establishes feasibility, not benefit: the primary outcome was negative, and the analgesic finding was secondary and unadjusted for multiple comparisons. Rare complications cannot be assessed in 160 patients, so low pressure is an option for the surgeon who is comfortable with the exposure, not a standard.

  • Low pressure was feasible without a longer operation in this trial.
  • The primary pain outcome at 6 hours was not significantly different.
  • The lower analgesic use was a secondary result; treat it as hypothesis-generating.
  • Keep a low threshold to raise the pressure if exposure is poor.

Why it matters

A widely adopted tweak to reduce pain did not clearly do so in a registered, blinded trial.

Don't overread it

The significant paracetamol result was secondary and the trial was too small for rare complications.

The statistics, in plain English

A p-value above 0.05 on the primary outcome means no difference was shown, not that none exists; a 160-patient trial is small. A single significant secondary result among several is weaker evidence, because testing many outcomes makes a chance finding likelier.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

uppergimissurgoncsurgcomphpb

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for general surgery, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app