DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 11 October 2026 edition

Research · 02 of 05

Radiotherapy added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer: better pathology, no survival gain

Weigh preoperative radiotherapy against the lack of survival difference in this matched cohort.

Design
Retrospective propensity-score-matched cohort, two referral centres
Population
452 matched patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Primary outcome
Event-free survival, recurrence pattern and overall survival
Effect
Event-free survival HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.37); overall survival HR 1.02 (0.79 to 1.32)

A retrospective propensity-matched cohort from two referral centres included 800 patients who had pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. After matching, 226 patients per group were compared, with or without preoperative radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy was linked to more node-negative disease (61.5% vs 33.6%) and R0 resection (85.0% vs 52.2%), and a pathologic complete response in 6.6% against 4.4%. Locoregional recurrence did not differ (subdistribution HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.54), and neither did event-free survival (HR 1.10, 0.88 to 1.37) or overall survival (HR 1.02, 0.79 to 1.32).

The pathology gains did not carry through to survival, which fits a disease dominated by distant recurrence. Retrospective matching cannot remove all selection bias. It supports caution about assuming that better margins mean longer survival, not a change in protocol on its own.

  • Do not read a higher R0 rate as proof of survival benefit; it was not seen here.
  • Distant recurrence was the first site of failure in about half of patients in both groups.
  • Take the question of radiotherapy to the multidisciplinary meeting with this caveat.
  • Randomised data remain the standard for deciding protocol changes.

Why it matters

It separates pathologic response from survival, two things often assumed to move together.

Don't overread it

This is a retrospective two-centre cohort; matching cannot rule out selection effects.

The statistics, in plain English

A hazard ratio close to 1 with an interval spanning 0.8 to 1.4 means the data are compatible with a small benefit or a small harm. Matching balances measured characteristics only, so unmeasured differences between who received radiotherapy may remain.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

uppergimissurgoncsurgcomphpb

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for general surgery, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app