DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 27 September 2026 edition

Research · 03 of 05

Biofeedback device or physiotherapist for pelvic floor training after prostatectomy: similar results

Device-guided and physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor training gave similar continence gains after prostatectomy.

Design
Randomised controlled trial
Population
109 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy
Primary outcome
≥50% reduction in 24-hour pad weight at 12 weeks
Effect
52.1% success overall; device vs physiotherapist OR 1.19 (0.53 to 2.66)

This randomised trial assigned 109 men with incontinence after radical prostatectomy to pelvic floor training with a non-invasive biofeedback device (55) or a physiotherapist (54). Both groups also did 12 weeks of whole-body high-effort resistance training.

Both groups improved on the 24-hour pad test (mean reduction 86 g). The primary endpoint, at least a 50% reduction in leakage, was reached by 52.1% overall with no difference between groups (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.66). A post hoc look at responders favoured the device, but this was exploratory. Longer time since surgery predicted less success; age did not.

The practical point is that a home device may be a reasonable substitute where physiotherapy access is limited, which is common in India. The trial was small and retrospectively registered, and its equivalence is an absence of detected difference rather than a formal non-inferiority result.

  • Start pelvic floor training early after prostatectomy; longer time since surgery predicted less success.
  • Offer a biofeedback device as an alternative where physiotherapist-led training is not accessible.
  • Measure leakage objectively with a 24-hour pad test before and after training.
  • Expect about half of men to halve their leakage with 12 weeks of training.

Why it matters

It widens access to continence rehabilitation where specialist physiotherapy is scarce.

Don't overread it

Small, retrospectively registered trial not designed for non-inferiority; no difference is not proof of equivalence.

The statistics, in plain English

An odds ratio of 1.19 with an interval from 0.53 to 2.66 means the device could be roughly half as effective or more than twice as effective; the trial cannot tell which.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

bladdercancerprostatecancerincontinenceuro

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for urology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app