- Design
- Multinational cross-sectional physician survey (Adelphi Disease Specific Programme)
- Population
- 2,583 patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer reported by 359 physicians in 8 countries
- Primary outcome
- Use of and reasons for refusing radical cystectomy
- Effect
- Cystectomy offered to 20% of BCG-treated patients; 68% of those refused (QoL 87%, stoma 60%, safety 37%)
This multinational cross-sectional survey, from China, Japan, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, collected physician-reported data on 2,583 patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer from 359 urologists and oncologists. Mean age was 68.9 years, 74% were men and 68% had T1 high-grade tumours.
BCG was first-line in 58%. Among patients with recurrent disease, radical cystectomy was used in 8% at second line, 7% at third and 8% at fourth. Among 825 patients who received BCG with further data, cystectomy was offered to 169 (20%), and 115 of these (68%) refused. The reasons were quality-of-life concerns (87%), unwillingness to have a stoma (60%) and surgical safety concerns (37%).
The data are physician-reported and cross-sectional, so selection and recall may affect them. They indicate that guideline-recommended cystectomy is often not what patients choose, which is why shared decision-making and bladder-preserving options matter.
- Cystectomy was offered to 20% of BCG-treated patients, and 68% of those refused.
- Reasons were quality of life (87%), stoma (60%) and safety (37%).
- Only 7% to 8% of recurrent cases had cystectomy at later lines.
- Prepare decision aids and stoma-nurse input before the cystectomy conversation.
- Discuss options and risks of delay openly with patients.
Why it matters
It exposes a gap between guideline recommendations and what patients accept.
Don't overread it
A physician-reported survey cannot show whether refusing cystectomy changes outcomes.
The statistics, in plain English
A refusal rate of 68% among 169 patients offered surgery is a descriptive figure from physician reports. It does not show what patients would choose with better information or with different bladder-preserving options available.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for urology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free