DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 16 October 2026 edition

Practice changer · 05 of 05

Robotic prostatectomy was associated with better 12-month continence and sexual function than open surgery in a national registry

Consider presenting these registry differences in counselling while stressing that surgeon experience, patient selection and non-response may explain part of them.

Design
National registry cohort with patient-reported outcomes (EPIC-26)
Population
4,889 men after radical prostatectomy (2,844 open, 2,045 robotic) in New Zealand, 2016 to 2024
Primary outcome
EPIC-26 domain scores at 12 months
Effect
Incontinence +6.9 points (95% CI 4.6 to 9.2); sexual +11.4 points (9.1 to 13.7) with robotic surgery

This New Zealand registry study analysed EPIC-26 patient-reported outcomes from 4,889 men who had primary radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2024: 2,844 open and 2,045 robotic. Completion was 52.3% at baseline and 78.8% at 12 months.

After adjustment for age, PSA and grade group, robotic surgery was associated with higher scores in every domain. The adjusted differences in urinary incontinence (6.9 points, 95% CI 4.6 to 9.2) and sexual function (11.4 points, 9.1 to 13.7) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference; obstruction, bowel and hormonal domains did not. At 12 months, 65.1% of robotic patients used no pads against 54.4% of open patients, and 3.9% against 10.0% used two or more pads a day. Good to very good sexual function was reported by 13.7% against 5.3%.

The design is observational, men were not randomised, and surgeon experience, case mix and non-response could explain part of the difference. It supports discussing functional outcomes in counselling, with surgeon volume and experience likely to matter as much as the platform.

  • Adjusted EPIC-26 continence score was 6.9 points higher with robotic surgery.
  • Adjusted sexual function score was 11.4 points higher with robotic surgery.
  • No pad use at 12 months: 65.1% robotic vs 54.4% open.
  • Two or more pads a day: 3.9% vs 10.0%.
  • Counsel on surgeon experience, which this registry could not adjust for.

Why it matters

Continence and erections are what patients ask about, and national data are a better guide than single-centre series.

Don't overread it

This observational registry cannot separate the effect of the platform from surgeon skill, case selection and incomplete questionnaire response.

The statistics, in plain English

A 6.9-point difference in a 0 to 100 score only matters if it exceeds the minimal clinically important difference, which for continence is 6 to 9 points, so it sits at the lower edge. Registry comparisons adjust only for measured factors, and questionnaire non-response can bias results either way.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

prostatecancerbladdercancerincontinenceuro

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for urology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app