- Design
- Phase 3 open-label extension of two randomised trials, 48 months
- Population
- Eyes with geographic atrophy from OAKS and DERBY continuing into GALE
- Primary outcome
- Geographic atrophy growth rate and retinal tissue preserved
- Effect
- Up to 24% slower growth vs projected sham; non-subfoveal early 3.16 mm² vs delayed 1.11 mm² preserved
GALE was the open-label extension of the phase 3 OAKS and DERBY trials of pegcetacoplan, a complement C3 inhibitor, for geographic atrophy. Eyes treated throughout had 48 months of therapy; eyes originally given sham crossed over at 24 months and had 24 months of treatment.
Over 48 months, continuous treatment reduced the growth rate of atrophy by up to 24% against projected sham, equivalent to 1.88 mm² of retina preserved. In non-subfoveal atrophy, early treatment preserved up to 3.16 mm² with monthly dosing, against 1.11 mm² with delayed treatment. The risk of progression to absolute scotoma at central test points was reduced by 32–43%. Safety was consistent with the parent trials.
The findings support starting before the fovea is involved if the drug is to be used at all. The comparison with 'projected sham' after crossover is a modelled estimate, the extension was open-label, and the drug slows anatomical growth rather than improving vision. Pegcetacoplan is FDA-approved; availability and cost elsewhere, including India, limit its use.
- Image and measure geographic atrophy with fundus autofluorescence at diagnosis
- Discuss complement inhibition before foveal involvement if it is available and affordable
- Tell patients that treatment slows loss of retina but does not restore vision
- Monitor for conversion to neovascular AMD during treatment
Why it matters
In a progressive disease with no way to recover lost tissue, the timing of treatment matters as much as the drug.
Don't overread it
Open-label extension with modelled comparisons — it slows atrophy growth but was not shown here to preserve reading vision.
The statistics, in plain English
'Projected sham' is a statistical extrapolation, because after 24 months there was no untreated group. The early-versus-delayed comparison is between originally randomised groups but after an open-label crossover, so it is weaker than the original trial comparison.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free