The edition · Radiology
Prostate cancer in germline variant carriers looked more aggressive on MRI
A case-control MRI study in hereditary prostate cancer, FAPI PET and tumour budding in colorectal cancer, radiation dose with angio-CT in liver embolisation, and a review arguing for CT colonography in screening.
The edition in brief
In a single-centre case-control study, 62 men with prostate cancer and a germline pathogenic variant were compared with 246 controls. Positive MRI (PI-RADS 3 or more) was similar (98% vs 96%), but carriers were more likely to have a PI-RADS 5 lesion (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.9) and grade 3 extraprostatic extension (OR 3.0, 1.5 to 5.8), and more were upgraded at prostatectomy (37% vs 20%). A 64-patient retrospective study found higher FAPI-42 PET uptake in colorectal cancers with intermediate or high-grade tumour budding (SUVmax 12.66 vs 10.16); a model with body mass index had an AUC of 0.841 and needs external validation. A retrospective comparison of 92 liver procedures found 3D effective dose 4.1-fold lower with angio-CT than cone-beam CT, but total dose differences were not significant after uncertainty correction (p = 0.053). A Radiographics review argues that CT colonography is accurate and underused for colorectal cancer screening.
Germline variant carriers with prostate cancer: more PI-RADS 5 lesions and more extraprostatic extension
Read prostate MRI in known germline carriers with extra care for extent of disease, since upgrading at surgery was more frequent in this series.
FAPI PET uptake tracked tumour budding in colorectal cancer, but only in a small retrospective series
FAPI uptake may relate to tumour budding, but the evidence is retrospective and unvalidated.
Angio-CT for liver embolisation: lower 3D dose, but total dose was not clearly lower
Angio-CT looks dose-neutral against cone-beam CT for liver procedures, so choose it on image quality and workflow.
A negative CT does not close the question when the history is suspicious
Say what a normal study cannot exclude, and suggest a next step if symptoms persist.
CT colonography for colorectal screening: a review's case for using it more
Consider CT colonography as an option where an experienced service exists, but base screening policy on trials and local guidelines, not on one review.
Read the rest in the app
You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this one is waiting in it.

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.
Tomorrow morning, before your first patient
One edition a day for radiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.
Get the app — free