DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 14 October 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 05

Germline variant carriers with prostate cancer: more PI-RADS 5 lesions and more extraprostatic extension

Read prostate MRI in known germline carriers with extra care for extent of disease, since upgrading at surgery was more frequent in this series.

Design
Single-centre retrospective case-control study
Population
62 men with prostate cancer and a germline pathogenic variant, compared with 246 consecutive controls
Primary outcome
Clinical, pathologic and MRI characteristics
Effect
PI-RADS 5 OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 4.9); grade 3 extraprostatic extension OR 3.0 (1.5 to 5.8); upgrading 37% vs 20%

This single-centre retrospective case-control study compared 62 men with prostate cancer, a germline pathogenic variant and an MRI at diagnosis with 246 consecutive controls. The variants were mostly in CHEK2 (21.0%), BRCA2 (19.4%), ATM (17.7%) and Lynch syndrome genes (17.7%).

The proportion with a positive MRI was almost the same (98% against 96%). Carriers were more likely to have a PI-RADS 5 score (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.9) and grade 3 extraprostatic extension (OR 3.0, 1.5 to 5.8). At prostatectomy, 37% of carriers were reclassified to a higher grade group against 20% of controls (P = 0.046). Age at diagnosis was similar (65 vs 67 years, P = 0.05).

The design is retrospective with selected carriers, and the upgrading P value is borderline. It supports reading MRI in known carriers with a lower threshold for caution about extent, but not a change in reporting criteria.

  • Note a known germline variant in the clinical history on the MRI request.
  • Look carefully for extraprostatic extension in carriers, where grade 3 extension was more frequent.
  • Mention in the report when a PI-RADS 5 lesion is seen in a known carrier.
  • Expect a normal MRI in carriers to be uncommon: 98% were positive here, as in controls.
  • Remember the study could not show effects on outcomes.

Why it matters

Hereditary disease may look more aggressive on imaging, which matters when MRI is used to plan surveillance or surgery.

Don't overread it

A single-centre retrospective comparison does not show that carriers need different imaging pathways or that outcomes differ.

The statistics, in plain English

An odds ratio of 2.7 with an interval of 1.5 to 4.9 means carriers had roughly two to five times the odds of a PI-RADS 5 score, but the study was retrospective with 62 carriers. A P value of 0.046 for upgrading is only just below 0.05, so that finding is fragile.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

nuclearimagingabdominalimaginginterventionalcontrastsafety

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for radiology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app