DailyDoctor Archive Specialties Get app
Back to the 24 September 2026 edition

Clinical update · 01 of 06

Only half of endothelial grafts survive three years after a glaucoma drainage device

Counsel patients with a glaucoma drainage device that an endothelial graft has about a 50% chance of surviving three years.

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 retrospective studies
Population
943 endothelial grafts in eyes with prior glaucoma surgery
Primary outcome
Graft survival
Effect
36-month survival 57% overall (48 to 66%); 50% after drainage device (42 to 57%)

A meta-analysis of 22 retrospective studies pooled 943 endothelial grafts (656 DSAEK, 287 DMEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma surgery, with at least six months of follow-up.

Pooled 36-month graft survival was 57% (95% CI 48% to 66%) overall and 50% (42% to 57%) after a glaucoma drainage device. Endothelial cell loss in drainage device eyes reached 53% at 6 months and 63% at 12 months. Dislocation was 19% in drainage device eyes and 15% overall. Rejection was 8% to 9%, primary failure 4% to 5%. DSAEK was numerically favoured from 24 months in indirect comparisons, but head-to-head studies showed no significant difference through 24 months.

These figures should shape consent. A patient with a tube shunt should be told plainly that their graft has roughly even odds of lasting three years, and that a repeat graft is likely.

  • Quote graft survival of about 50% at three years to patients with a drainage device.
  • Plan for closer endothelial cell count monitoring in the first year.
  • Consider DSAEK in drainage device eyes where surgeon experience allows; the evidence is indirect.
  • Coordinate IOP control with the glaucoma team before and after keratoplasty.

Why it matters

It gives the first pooled survival figures for a high-risk group where counselling has relied on small series.

Don't overread it

All studies were retrospective, and the DSAEK advantage comes from indirect comparisons only.

The statistics, in plain English

A pooled survival of 50% with an interval of 42% to 57% is fairly precise. Indirect comparisons between techniques mix studies with different patients and surgeons, so they are weaker than head-to-head data.

Read the rest in the app

You have read your two free briefings this month. The app carries all 27 specialties, every morning, free — and this finding is waiting in it.

QR code to install Daily Doctor
Get Daily Doctor — free

Scan to keep reading on your phone. No account needed to start.

corneaglaucomacataractsurgpaedophth

Tomorrow morning, before your first patient

One edition a day for ophthalmology, written by the desk, every claim tied to its paper. Six minutes.

Get the app — free
Daily Doctor All 27 specialties, every morning. Free.
Get the app